Thursday, February 19, 2009

Time well spent?

Hi there!

Wow, it's been a long long time since I last blogged, just over a month! I've been a little busy guys, sorry!  It was nice being back in Aberystwyth for a few weeks and just as you settle into an area, it's time to leave! This was very true of 1st teaching placement, and I fear might be true of my 2nd, (which starts on Monday!)

You're going to have to forgive me, but this blog might be a wee bit of a rant.  Like I said I've spent 6 weeks in Aberystwyth, on my second "long" block at University and I have just 6 days to look forward to June, which I fear will just be one week long drinking binge to congratulate myself on becoming Peter...BA (Hons), PGDE.  Yep, really collecting up the letter.  In reality my course ends on 27th April with the submission of my PDP (Professional Development Portfolio.) All throughly dull stuff  I can tell you.

Anyway, lets get cracking!

I realised that firstly I wasn't as active back in Aber as I was in School.  Anyone who knows me, know I've gotta keep myself occupied.  I'm at my most useless when I'm doing nothing! For 10 solid weeks I worked from 8:30am to 4pm.  I'd go home, work until about 6pm. I'd be exhausted, but I'd sleep well and more importantly I was productive! I loved it!  Then came Aberystwyth, 3 days a week for 16 hours a week! Monday and Thursday free. Not good, I felt like a Fresher again, some deadline weeks away and very little else to do except go out and drink. 
  Tuesdays were great, 9 to 5! Four hours of History and three hours of Games! Excellent, Tuesday's were my favourite days! Until the timetable started to moved because of two reasons. Firstly, the snow...which didn't actually affect Aber but seemingly ground the whole of Ceredigion to a halt and secondly, the Timetable kept getting changed.  I wasn't need to go in Tuesday, but I was required all of Wednesday.  Suddenly, my timetable was thrown up in the air, I wasn't sure what I was doing on each day, (to be honest I think my tutor didn't know either.)  I don't like it when things are moved around and changed, probably some mild form of OCD I know! But I felt like, the idea of the last three weeks was to run down the clock.  A few other students felt the same.
  I'd fully understand, if the tutor had put their hands up and say "I've not got much else left to teach you, come in on this date, this date, and this date.  Other then that, go do your essays, lesson plans, or in my case find somewhere to bloody live for Teaching Placement 2!"  But no, we were subjected to Four hour workshop sessions, which had 30 minute breaks in the middle, followed by go to the Computer Room for 30 minutes and read this...and so on.  In fact, in one Four Hour workshop myself and a colleague worked out, we did on 90 minutes work! 90 minutes in Four hours! Waste of time, perhaps?
  I hate to say it, but I was seriously considering thinking is this University's course a waste of money?  There are some bad points "built in" to the course, I fully understand.  The Geographical location of the University, means I wont see my tutor until about May time now.  When they visit me at my school.  But still, that's fine.  I knew that before I signed up, and my complaint isn't the "detachment" I felt from my University when out on teaching placement.  That will happen, and I do accept it.  Secondly, I felt the PDS lectures on a Friday Morning weren't relevant at times.  A talk on finding a teaching post from the Careers department, was next to worthless despite the fact the speaker was brilliant and engaging.  I know that sounds like a contradiction, but I think a speaker can be interesting and engaging despite not having the material to further interest listeners.  Secondly, a talk from another interesting speaker from a teacher's union was throughly enjoyable, and personally the speaker would have made a great career out of stand up.  But still, little real knowledge was being imparted.  And those were the good lectures!  I won't pass comment on the lectures I received on Health Education, Educational Visits, and Sustainable Development!  
  And then there was the Great PSE lesson fiasco! Two weeks spent planning a lesson on differences, with little guidance from a scheme of work or what we were supposed to! Then arriving at the school in question, left in the staff and the teachers expecting that we knew where we had to go! When the Course co-ordinators told us nothing! I know, I'm a trainee but I was made to look amateur, and thankfully myself and my team-teaching colleague could "blag" enough to complete the lesson and ensure the Learning Objectives were achieved.

I know what you're thinking, and you're right.  I was left with a bitter taste in my mouth, but there were some good points to my time there, I felt the course did miss the role of ICT in History (see History 2.0 blog below, and coming soon a History 2.1 blog) and the Education Act 2006, which means a teacher can use "reasonable force" to restrain and remove a pupil from the classroom, can anyone out there tell what "reasonable force" is? Sadly, I felt this important piece of legislation was missed and needed to be covered.  Perhaps, they needed a "Teachers and the Law" module.  But that sounds way too clever.

I do apologise about my rant, but I left I needed to get it off my chest.  I'm off to Teaching Placement 2 on Saturday, and start on Monday. I'm really looking forward to tackling a new school and wealth of different problems and issues that school will face.  I miss my First school, it was great and the staff were terrific, if the staff are half as good then I will have an excellent time.

Next time, an update to my History 2.0 blog.  History 2.1 and a further dive into the role of VLE's, Podcasts. iMovie (or Movie maker for PC), Discussion boards, and the joys of Promethan.

See you soon,

Peter.

x
  

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Top of the League?

Hey!

Happy New year! Hope your well and fabulous! Well, School Experience 1 is all over! I was very sad to leave my school, but now I'm back in University until Mid-Feb.  So I should hopefully have a bit more time to give this attention and push up it's profile a little.  But hey, I enjoy it!

So, what I am discussing today?  As you can see, it's League Tables! Yes, dreaded DREADED league tables!  Every headmaster has the same nightmare when they are published to see how well they are doing in their LEA (local education authority.)  

Firstly, let me get my opinions out of the way.  League tables are a terrible thing! Wales scraped League Tables a while back, and it's a great idea.  So why do they do it in England?  Don't get me wrong reader, I'm a deeply competitive man (as my girlfriend will attest to!)  But Education shouldn't be competitive.  Who the hell are you trying to beat in the first place? I think it's wrong to publicly humiliate schools.  Plus, League Tables don't give much context.  For example, you'll find Grammar Schools always at the top of a table.  Then after that, the table has no context.  For example, pupils who live in a "poor" catchment area are surely going to be near the bottom.  Where another school, within a more affluent area will score a higher level.  Furthermore, there is no provision on League Tables describing the amount of pupils on the school's SEN register! Some school will have around 10-15% of pupils on the SEN register.  However, no school I've applied for as 45% on the SEN register! Nearly 50/50! Insane!  Moreover, there's always no provision to tell you how many pupils speak English as an Additional language, now that's a big problem for a very obvious reason! 

Long and the short of it, the League Table is a lot of..."cock" frankly to quote James May.  Education Secretary Ed Balls, wants school to have a minimum of 30% A*-C 5 GCSE grades, otherwise they will face closure.  Now, to the great unwashed (those outside of the Education Profession) think 30% isn't a lot!  But I'll show you my home LEA of Sandwell.  It has currently 22 Secondary Schools, Academies and Colleges.  If the 30% rule came into effect, immediately.  6 schools would be closed right now! With another 4 schools within a 2% margin of dipping below 30%!  Incredible!  I'll bite my tongue, and just let you have a think about that?  What will happen to all those pupils in those schools.  The School I attended as a child has a 32% 5 A*-C GCSE grade rate.  I remember when I left, it was 40% and the local papers were called in! To celebrate the results!

But, before I go completely destroying League Tables, there is one shining light within them! Just one, but I think it's good. It's the "level 2 CVA (contextual added score.)"  This shows the "improvement" of the middle ranked pupils at the school.  How much does the school get the most of its pupils potential.  Any school with a score over 1000, is above the National Average.  Now surely, the area I live must be bad right? It's results are 16.1% behind the National Average for GCSE grades.  Sandwell's average is 998.8  Just shy of the magic 1000 point score, but two schools in the top 5% of schools across England for its added score!  Yeah, League tables suddenly look more ridiculous!  But if you're going to use League tables to look at schools in your area.  Check out its Level 2 CVA score.  It's probably the best thing going in the League Table System!

In my opinion, I'd scrap League Tables.  But I would allow parents to know the school level 2 CVA score.  But if you really want a really good idea to what the school is like! Read it's Section 5 Ofsted (Estyn in Wales.) inspection.  Again inspections have there bad points, it's to easy to pick out a school's weaknesses.  But I think strategies should be offered to help that school improve.

So there you have it, hope you enjoyed reading!

Until Next Time,

Peter

x